Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even when the Galaxy A31 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy A31 is thinner and incredibly lighter.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity in each screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy A31 count with extremely similar storage for games and applications, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy A31 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.