Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Samsung Galaxy A31 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy A31 one, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit worse screen pixels density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Galaxy A31's one, they have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A31. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A31 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a much more MP camera and a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.