Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Galaxy A31, with an 88.5 score against 81.3. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy A31 were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a bit higher display pixel density and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.