Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy A31, with a 92.3 score against 81.3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a bit lighter and thinner device than the Galaxy A31, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A31 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A31 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.