Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A31's 81.3 general score. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A31.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A31 features more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A31 features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way higher video definition, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.