Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A31 design is just a little lighter but a little thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a better 2080 x 2400px resolution, a little better number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a battery duration that's very similar to Galaxy A31's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.