Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a score of 81.3 against 75.7. The Galaxy A31 design is just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 3 years before. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A31, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a higher resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A31 feature very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.