Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Galaxy A32 5G, with a general score of 88.1 against 75. Even though iPhone X is noticeably older than the Galaxy A32 5G, it's design is lighter and thinner. The iPhone X features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a way better pixel number per display inch.
IPhone X has an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Apple iPhone X features slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 5G has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.