Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. IPhone XS is an extremely older cellphone than Galaxy A32 5G, but Apple was able to make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone XS counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS features a way better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a way greater amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A32 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.