Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, having a overall score of 82.5 against 75. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an older phone than Galaxy A32 5G, but Google was able to make it lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Galaxy A32 5G takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.