Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 80 score against 75. Google Pixel 3 is an way older device than Galaxy A32 5G, but it is thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a way higher pixel amount per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.