Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, having a overall score of 80.7 against 75. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a camera with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.