Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having a 78.8 score against 75. Both phones we are comparing here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Google Pixel 3a is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but Google managed to make it thinner and extremely lighter.
The Google Pixel 3a has a lot better performance than Galaxy A32 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per display inch and a way higher 1080 x 2220 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more MP. The Galaxy A32 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.