Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, with a general score of 78.9 against 75. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released about 21 months before.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Galaxy A32 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 5G captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A32 5G has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.