Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 75. The Google Pixel 4 is an older cellphone than the Galaxy A32 5G, but it is extremely lighter and thinner anyway. Google Pixel 4 counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a much more MP camera. The Galaxy A32 5G features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.