Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than Galaxy A32 5G, having an 82.9 score against 75. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL is older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixel quantity per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.