Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 4a and Galaxy A32 5G were released with only 5 months difference, the Google Pixel 4a is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system.
The Google Pixel 4a has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way greater pixels density. Google Pixel 4a features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A32 5G captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.