Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 87.5 score against 75. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide identical OS features. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Galaxy A32 5G were released only a couple of months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better display density. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 5G has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A32 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.