Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having an 89 score against 75. Although the Google Pixel 5 and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G were released with only 3 months difference, the Google Pixel 5 is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 5 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A32 5G features greater battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.