Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) body is notably thinner and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 220 x 2480, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A32 5G features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lower video frame rates, they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same resolution back facing camera. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) and Galaxy A32 5G both count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.