Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with a 77.7 score against 75. Both of these phones have Android OS, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. HTC One M9's construction is notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 6 years before.
HTC One M9 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The HTC One M9 has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features much more storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G features a bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.