Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting a general score of 77.6 against 75. The HTC U11 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released 4 years before. The HTC U11 has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The HTC U11 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 5G has a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.