Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. These devices use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is incredibly older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is much lighter and thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A32 5G features a really longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.