Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's score of 75. The LG V35 ThinQ is an much older phone than Galaxy A32 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Galaxy A32 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.