Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. The LG V40 ThinQ body is thinner and lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel count per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.