Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Interstellar Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 83.4 score against 75. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is noticeably newer, a bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A32 5G.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has more RAM. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a camera with more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.