Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LTPS |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has an overall score of 81.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. Although it's the best in this review, the Moto G 5G construction is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A32 5G. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Moto G 5G has an older 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11.
The Moto G 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, more pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G both feature extremely similar batteries performance.
The Motorola Moto G 5G takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a camera with a 48 megapixels, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.