Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with a score of 86.2 against 75. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Moto G200 5G is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. The Moto G200 5G has a lot better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a better screen pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The Moto G200 5G features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G200 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G200 5G features a battery performance that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.