Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G7 Plus has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G7 Plus has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each display inch and a way better 1080 x 2270px resolution. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A32 5G features more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.