Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with a 75.8 score against 75. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features. Moto Z Force's design is a lot lighter and extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Moto Z Force features a very superior CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, although it has lesser processing cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Moto Z Force features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy A32 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.