Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having a 77.6 score against 75. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11, so it gives some extra features and performance enhancements. Although Moto Z3 is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is notably thinner and way lighter.
Moto Z3 has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution. Moto Z3 counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A32 5G has a better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Moto Z3 features a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a very superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.