Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue and Brown |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, with a overall score of 80.7 against 75. The Motorola One Vision is an older phone than the Galaxy A32 5G, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Motorola One Vision features a way better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a much greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Vision has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Vision features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.