Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with a general score of 87 against 75. Although Motorola razr (2020) and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G were released with only a couple months difference, Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a higher 876 x 2142 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera aperture for better photography in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.