Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 270 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides some extra features. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is way newer, just a little bit lighter and much thinner than Galaxy A32 5G.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way higher video definition and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.