Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-05-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia X20 is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a general score of 77.2 against 75. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. The Nokia X20 body has the same thickness than Galaxy A32 5G, but it is just a little bit heavier.
The Nokia X20 features a much faster CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia X20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Nokia X20 features a brighter display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a way better resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, a higher display density and a little bit larger display.
Nokia X20 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A32 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Nokia X20, although it has a camera with a much worse 48 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a bit superior battery life than Nokia X20, because it has a 12% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.