Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 83.8 score against 75. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy A50 features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A50 has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.