Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is way better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 90.7 score against 75. The Galaxy A52 design is just a little thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even when both of them were released with only a few months difference. Galaxy A52 features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52 features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy A32 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.