Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's overall score of 75. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A70 is older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's body is lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite bigger screen and more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A70 has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A32 5G has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.