Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Prism bricks black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 92.9 score against 75. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, even though both were only released 6 months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a better amount of pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera in the back with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.