Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is an a lot older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.