Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C5 is just a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G, with a overall score of 76.4 against 75. Galaxy C5 is an extremely older phone than Galaxy A32 5G, but Samsung made it noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy C5 has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy C5 has a very superior performance than Galaxy A32 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy C5 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger aperture and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. Galaxy A32 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.