Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Galaxy Note 20's construction is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, although they were only released 5 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A32 5G features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy A32 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A32 5G also has higher video frame rates and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.