Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a little heavier but somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and they were only released with a few months difference. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, giving a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a way greater display density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.