Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's score of 75. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note 3 is notably older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is just a little thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A32 5G has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 5G has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.