Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting a score of 79.3 against 75. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is incredibly older than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's body is thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light situations and a way more MP back camera.
Galaxy A32 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.