Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Galaxy A32 5G, having an 80.4 score against 75. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an a lot older cellphone than Galaxy A32 5G, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a very superior processor than Galaxy A32 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.