Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with an 89 score against 75. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a really superior performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Galaxy A32 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy Note10 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.