Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger display. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.