Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. Galaxy Note5's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. Galaxy Note5 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much greater pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note5 features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery size. The Galaxy A32 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.