Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than Galaxy A32 5G's score of 75. The Galaxy S20 FE body is a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy A32 5G, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should offer all the same OS features.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher display density and a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Galaxy S20 FE features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 5G features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A32 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.